At War Blog: Highlights From Karzai, Obama News Conference

President Obama, after meeting with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan, said Friday that the United States would be able to accelerate the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan in coming months because of gains made by Afghan security forces.

As the Times’s Mark Landler reported, Mr. Obama also made it clear that he contemplated leaving relatively few troops in Afghanistan after the NATO combat mission ends in 2014, saying that the mission will be focused on advising and supporting Afghan troops and targeting the remnants of Al Qaeda.

You can watch the full video here:

You can also find the joint statement, released by President Obama and President Karzai here.

Read More..

Gadgetwise Blog: Q&A: Dealing With Duplicate Work on Dropbox

What happens if two people work on the same file at the same time in a shared Dropbox folder? Does one copy of the file overwrite the other?

If two people are editing the same file at the same time, Dropbox saves both versions of the file in the shared folder. The service does not merge the two different files, but adds the words “conflicted copy” to the file name of the second version so it is obvious that two different copies of the same file now exist.

The file name of the second copy also lists the date that the conflict occurred between the two versions of the file. The computer name or name of the person who was working on the file is appended to the name as well, making it somewhat easier to identify the collaborator and ensure that everyone’s changes are incorporated into one final version of the document.

Read More..

Doctor and Patient: When the Doctor Returns to Doctoring

Several years ago, a highly respected medical expert I had just met shared a little-known detail of his illustrious career: as a young doctor, he had stopped practicing medicine for a few years to homeschool his son.

His revelation took me completely by surprise. Doctors rarely talked about taking time off for fear that colleagues would assume them incompetent or in possession of some serious personal flaw.

I understood my colleagues’ hesitation because I always avoided bringing up my own decision to take a professional hiatus.

I had had a harrowing pregnancy, marked by bleeding that worsened anytime I operated. I stopped seeing patients soon after my first trimester and made the decision to extend that break after the birth of healthy twin daughters. But I did so without realizing just how difficult it would be to return.

In all the articles, essays and books on the growing trend among professionals to “opt out” of their careers, doctors, I would discover, remained strangely absent. While the lawyers, accountants, business executives and teachers seemed to ease back into their careers after a few years raising children, attending to their own or loved ones’ health issues or even pursuing entirely new careers, I couldn’t find answers to even my most basic questions. Did I need to be tested, proctored or re-trained? Would I work as an assistant, a doctor-in-training equivalent or a fully trained physician? Were there rules and “industry standards” I needed to pass in order to assure patients I was safe? And in the world of practicing doctors, would the time I spent away from medicine always remain “That-Period-Which-Shall-Not-Be-Named?”

Now, nearly a decade later, studies have shown that more doctors than ever are choosing to take time off, at least twice as many as in previous generations. But while these physicians have more company and support than their predecessors, returning to practice remains daunting in large part because of the persistent stigma. (Interestingly, most of the re-entry doctors I spoke to hesitated or declined to be quoted for this article.)

Although concerns about the competency of returning doctors are justified, the profession’s aversion to discussing the issue and reluctance even to recognize it has had perverse results. There are no national standards for doctors who want to return to clinical practice, only a helter-skelter set of hurdles, hoops and headaches.

“The safety net has big holes in it,” said Dr. Claudette Dalton, the former chair of the American Medical Association’s task force on re-entry who has interrupted her own medical career and re-entered clinical practice twice. For example, roughly half of all the state medical boards, including New York’s, have no policy for doctors attempting to return to clinical practice after an extended period of time away. But even in those states with requirements that range from mandatory completion of an official re-entry training program to passing a written exam, it’s unclear that such policies really do ensure competence. Research on physician re-entry is scarce; and no one really knows when time away begins to affect a doctor’s clinical skills and what might best remediate any deficiencies. Indeed, aside from a few surveys, little is even known about who the re-entering doctors are.

“Our profession needs to be able to reassure patients that the doctor they are seeing knows what he or she is doing and isn’t rusty and creaky like some unoiled door hinge,” Dr. Dalton said.

One particularly promising initiative is a mentored clinical program that slowly re-introduces doctors to practice. At the physician re-entry program at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, one of fewer than a dozen such programs throughout the country, re-entering doctors work with three different experienced senior physicians in their field, attend lectures, participate in teaching and work rounds, take call and progressively shoulder more responsibility. At the end of two or three months, the doctors submit to a rigorous exit interview, where they can be drilled on any of the cases they have seen.

Of the 14 doctors who have gone through the Cedars-Sinai program, 13 have successfully returned to practice. But with the costs for such programs ranging from $5,000 to $10,000 a month or more, many doctors cannot even consider enrolling in one even if their state licensing boards mandates them.

“We’ve had a blind spot when it comes to physician re-entry,” said Dr. Leo A. Gordon, who heads the Cedars-Sinai program, “even though it really should be part of the profession’s obligation, especially with the upcoming physician shortage.”

That doctor deficit is expected to surpass 100,000 physicians within the next 15 years. But according to the American Medical Association, at least 10,000 doctors each year are currently looking to return to clinical practice. Re-entry experts believe that these doctors, if successfully returned to practice, could not only help to alleviate the doctor shortage but would do so quickly.

“This is not a seven-year pipeline,” said Dr. Dalton, referring to the usual time required to educate and train a new doctor. “This is a 6-month to a year pipeline at most because a lot of those doctors when assessed could be perfectly fine.”

Although the A.M.A. and a few professional organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics have increased their efforts to support returning physicians and create national standards, those initiatives will only falter without a major shift in the attitude of the profession itself.

“We have to realize that it’s not about abdicating your profession,” Dr. Dalton said. “It’s about having some sensibility about the priority in your life at a certain moment, then returning to your clinical roots and coming back to serve your profession.”

I have been back in clinical practice for several years now. My path of return was neither obvious nor straightforward, but I have always remained grateful to the doctor who oversaw my re-entry process. He and his colleagues willingly took me on, persisted in putting me through the paces and displayed an unfailing and contagious devotion to the highest standards of care.

Through it all, they understood that stopping working as a doctor temporarily to be a mother never meant I had stopped loving patient care.

---

Correction: The head of the Cedars-Sinair re-entry program is Leo A. Gordon, not Leo G. Gordon.

Read More..

Doctor and Patient: When the Doctor Returns to Doctoring

Several years ago, a highly respected medical expert I had just met shared a little-known detail of his illustrious career: as a young doctor, he had stopped practicing medicine for a few years to homeschool his son.

His revelation took me completely by surprise. Doctors rarely talked about taking time off for fear that colleagues would assume them incompetent or in possession of some serious personal flaw.

I understood my colleagues’ hesitation because I always avoided bringing up my own decision to take a professional hiatus.

I had had a harrowing pregnancy, marked by bleeding that worsened anytime I operated. I stopped seeing patients soon after my first trimester and made the decision to extend that break after the birth of healthy twin daughters. But I did so without realizing just how difficult it would be to return.

In all the articles, essays and books on the growing trend among professionals to “opt out” of their careers, doctors, I would discover, remained strangely absent. While the lawyers, accountants, business executives and teachers seemed to ease back into their careers after a few years raising children, attending to their own or loved ones’ health issues or even pursuing entirely new careers, I couldn’t find answers to even my most basic questions. Did I need to be tested, proctored or re-trained? Would I work as an assistant, a doctor-in-training equivalent or a fully trained physician? Were there rules and “industry standards” I needed to pass in order to assure patients I was safe? And in the world of practicing doctors, would the time I spent away from medicine always remain “That-Period-Which-Shall-Not-Be-Named?”

Now, nearly a decade later, studies have shown that more doctors than ever are choosing to take time off, at least twice as many as in previous generations. But while these physicians have more company and support than their predecessors, returning to practice remains daunting in large part because of the persistent stigma. (Interestingly, most of the re-entry doctors I spoke to hesitated or declined to be quoted for this article.)

Although concerns about the competency of returning doctors are justified, the profession’s aversion to discussing the issue and reluctance even to recognize it has had perverse results. There are no national standards for doctors who want to return to clinical practice, only a helter-skelter set of hurdles, hoops and headaches.

“The safety net has big holes in it,” said Dr. Claudette Dalton, the former chair of the American Medical Association’s task force on re-entry who has interrupted her own medical career and re-entered clinical practice twice. For example, roughly half of all the state medical boards, including New York’s, have no policy for doctors attempting to return to clinical practice after an extended period of time away. But even in those states with requirements that range from mandatory completion of an official re-entry training program to passing a written exam, it’s unclear that such policies really do ensure competence. Research on physician re-entry is scarce; and no one really knows when time away begins to affect a doctor’s clinical skills and what might best remediate any deficiencies. Indeed, aside from a few surveys, little is even known about who the re-entering doctors are.

“Our profession needs to be able to reassure patients that the doctor they are seeing knows what he or she is doing and isn’t rusty and creaky like some unoiled door hinge,” Dr. Dalton said.

One particularly promising initiative is a mentored clinical program that slowly re-introduces doctors to practice. At the physician re-entry program at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, one of fewer than a dozen such programs throughout the country, re-entering doctors work with three different experienced senior physicians in their field, attend lectures, participate in teaching and work rounds, take call and progressively shoulder more responsibility. At the end of two or three months, the doctors submit to a rigorous exit interview, where they can be drilled on any of the cases they have seen.

Of the 14 doctors who have gone through the Cedars-Sinai program, 13 have successfully returned to practice. But with the costs for such programs ranging from $5,000 to $10,000 a month or more, many doctors cannot even consider enrolling in one even if their state licensing boards mandates them.

“We’ve had a blind spot when it comes to physician re-entry,” said Dr. Leo A. Gordon, who heads the Cedars-Sinai program, “even though it really should be part of the profession’s obligation, especially with the upcoming physician shortage.”

That doctor deficit is expected to surpass 100,000 physicians within the next 15 years. But according to the American Medical Association, at least 10,000 doctors each year are currently looking to return to clinical practice. Re-entry experts believe that these doctors, if successfully returned to practice, could not only help to alleviate the doctor shortage but would do so quickly.

“This is not a seven-year pipeline,” said Dr. Dalton, referring to the usual time required to educate and train a new doctor. “This is a 6-month to a year pipeline at most because a lot of those doctors when assessed could be perfectly fine.”

Although the A.M.A. and a few professional organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics have increased their efforts to support returning physicians and create national standards, those initiatives will only falter without a major shift in the attitude of the profession itself.

“We have to realize that it’s not about abdicating your profession,” Dr. Dalton said. “It’s about having some sensibility about the priority in your life at a certain moment, then returning to your clinical roots and coming back to serve your profession.”

I have been back in clinical practice for several years now. My path of return was neither obvious nor straightforward, but I have always remained grateful to the doctor who oversaw my re-entry process. He and his colleagues willingly took me on, persisted in putting me through the paces and displayed an unfailing and contagious devotion to the highest standards of care.

Through it all, they understood that stopping working as a doctor temporarily to be a mother never meant I had stopped loving patient care.

---

Correction: The head of the Cedars-Sinair re-entry program is Leo A. Gordon, not Leo G. Gordon.

Read More..

France Near Deal to Simplify Labor Regulations

PARIS — French labor unions and business leaders appeared close to striking a deal Friday to make it easier to hire and fire employees in France’s notoriously rigid labor market. An accord would tame some of the most confounding rules in the 3,200-page labor code, as the country tries to increase its competitiveness and curb unemployment.

After weeks of sparring among the five major labor unions and the main employers’ lobby, both sides were edging toward a breakthrough that could pave the way for a series of changes that President François Hollande has said are needed to burnish France’s international allure as a place to do business.

Those ambitions were clouded recently by a series of high-profile episodes, including a recent government threat to nationalize an ArcelorMittal plant in northeastern France to preserve jobs. There was also the audacious decision during the past week by the French actor Gérard Depardieu to take Russian citizenship to escape a proposed 75 percent marginal tax rate on incomes of more than €1 million, or €1.3 million.

The labor measures expected to be cemented in the accord still being worked out late Friday would help address what Louis Gallois, Mr. Hollande’s investment commissioner, has dubbed a “two-speed” labor market in France. Under that system, employees on long-term contracts enjoy extensive, costly job protections and benefits, while temporary workers, whose ranks have surged to one-third of the French labor force, have minimal job security and relatively few benefits.

The changes under discussion would include giving employers more flexibility to reduce working hours in times of economic distress without incurring union strikes. High levels of compensation that courts can award to laid-off workers would be trimmed, and the five-year period that ex-employees now have to contest layoffs would be reduced.

In November, the government introduced a tax credit for companies, potentially worth a total of €20 billion, aimed at easing high employment costs.

In exchange, business negotiators on Friday agreed, as a concession to unions, to pay higher taxes for short-term work contracts. Two unions objected that the offer was not enough, a hitch that could still scuttle the talks. But if approved, that move would expand government coffers meant to support the unemployed, while also nudging employers toward favoring long-term contracts. Employers would also pay somewhat higher contributions for private health insurance.

But whether any of the changes, even if nailed down in a binding agreement, will come fast enough to fix France’s problems is an open question. Some economists now say that France could become the next sick man of Europe if it does not improve the environment for investment and hiring.

“Given the gap we still have between the level of labor market regulation in France and in countries like the United States, Britain and Ireland, it is very clear that when observers look at the outcome, they will say it’s a step in the right direction, but not enough,” said Dominique Barbet, the European economist for BNP Paribas in Paris.

“But we also need to keep in mind that in France, if you want to make reforms, you have to go through small steps first,” he said. “You can’t try to change the system overnight. That usually results in mass protests in the streets.”

Mr. Hollande’s government is expected to sign off on the deal. He has said it will help him keep a promise of reducing unemployment, now at a 13-year high of 10.7 percent, by the end of 2013. Youth unemployment is now around 25 percent.

Mr. Hollande sought the accord after Mr. Gallois issued a stark assessment of the French economy in November, saying the country needed a “competitiveness shock” that would require politicians to curb the “cult of regulation” that the Mr. Gallois said was choking business.

Under current labor rules, many entrepreneurs in France hesitate to hire large numbers of workers. Some employers even resort to operating several companies with no more than 49 employees each, instead of running larger ones that employ hundreds.

That is because after the 50th person is hired, a stack of new regulations come into play, including lengthy firing procedures even for underperforming employees, and requirements for numerous union representatives.

Temporary contracts fall on the other end of the scale: they are often lower-paid and offer far fewer protections, something that has alarmed French labor unions. More than 80 percent of new contracts now issued in France are short term, a trend that has grown steadily as employers turn to them to escape the costly rules protecting permanent workers.

Mr. Gallois’s report said that unless France relaxed its labor rules, the country would continue on an industrial decline that had destroyed more than 750,000 jobs in a decade and helped shrink France’s share of exports to the European Union to 9.3 percent from 12.7 percent. The report also called for cuts to a variety of business taxes used to pay for government and France’s expensive social safety net.

The International Monetary Fund in December warned that France needed to lift competitiveness or risk rising unemployment. Because of continued impediments in the functioning of labor and product markets, the fund added, French companies were earning lower profit margins than in other European countries, in turn affecting the ability of enterprises to invest and innovate.

While the impact of such changes will take time, France has already taken a series of steps that could help it skirt the worst in coming years. A fiscal consolidation begun in 2010 is continuing, in which tax increases and spending cuts are being applied to bring the overall budget deficit down to 3 percent of gross domestic product in 2013, from an estimated 4.5 percent in 2012.

The economy is expected to grow about 0.4 percent in 2013, according to the I.M.F.

“What’s most important is that France get an economic recovery,” said Mr. Barbet, of BNP Paribas. “If we don’t have that, people won’t hire no matter what the new labor rules are.”

Read More..

Blasts in Pakistan Kill at Least 88 and Raise Fears Over Elections

Waheed Khan/European Pressphoto Agency

The worst violence was concentrated in the southwestern city of Quetta, where two explosions killed at least 57 people and wounded more than 110, the police said.

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — Bomb blasts in two Pakistani cities killed at least 88 people on Thursday and wounded more than 270, offering harrowing evidence of how the country’s myriad internal conflicts may destabilize it as elections approach.

The worst violence was concentrated in the southwestern city of Quetta, where two explosions a few minutes apart in the evening ripped through a billiards hall in a neighborhood dominated by ethnic Hazara Shiites, killing at least 57 people and wounding more than 110, the police said.

A suicide bomber detonated his explosives inside the hall, and a second attacker then blew up his vehicle outside the club as police officers and journalists arrived, a senior police officer, Mir Zubair Mehmood, told reporters. The television channel Samaa said one of its camera operators was killed by the second explosion after rushing to the scene. Hospitals were overwhelmed as casualties arrived through the evening.

Quetta is no stranger to sectarian, nationalist and Islamist violence. Most violence against Shiites there has been directed by Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, a Sunni militant group with strong ties to the Pakistani Taliban. But there was no immediate claim of responsibility for the billiard hall attack.

An ethnic Baluch separatist group claimed responsibility for another bombing earlier on Thursday, aimed at paramilitary soldiers in a commercial part of Quetta, which killed 12 people.

The Hazara, minority Shiites who migrated from Afghanistan more than a century ago, have been the target of dozens of attacks from sectarian death squads led by Lashkar-e-Jhangvi in Quetta over the past year, but the billiard hall attack was by far the bloodiest.

Human rights activists said the police and the security forces failed to protect the vulnerable community. “The callousness and indifference of authorities offers a damning indictment of the state, its military and security agencies,” said Ali Dayan Hasan, the Pakistan director at Human Rights Watch.

The other focus of violence on Thursday was the Swat Valley, in the Hindu Kush mountains in northwestern Pakistan, where an explosion in the basement of a religious seminary killed at least 22 people and wounded an additional 60. It was not clear why the seminary, run by the Islamic missionary group Tableeghi Jamaat, was a target.

Initial reports said a gas leak had caused the explosion, but police and hospital officials later said that there was clear evidence of a bomb.

Doctors at a hospital in Saidu Sharif, near the site, said blast victims were being treated for wounds caused by ball bearings, which are sometimes packed into suicide bombs to make them more deadly.

“There was a smell of explosives,” Muhammad Iqbal, a senior doctor, said by telephone.

The violence underscores the fragility of state authority in parts of Pakistan as the country prepares for a general election that analysts say is likely to take place before June. Many Pakistanis worry that increasing instability could cause the elections to be postponed.

Islamist violence in Swat drew international condemnation in October after Taliban gunmen shot a teenage schoolgirl and education activist, Malala Yousafzai. The episode highlighted how Islamist fighters were slowly returning to the valley three years after a Pakistani military operation drove them away.

Ismail Khan contributed reporting from Peshawar, Pakistan.

Read More..

2 Years Into Its Turnaround, Nokia Shows Promise

BERLIN — Nearly two years ago, Stephen Elop, fresh from a senior post at Microsoft, spoke of flaming ocean platforms and shark-infested waters to describe the competitive climate he inherited at Nokia, the erstwhile leader in mobile phones that was then teetering on the brink of irrelevance.

Mr. Elop, an affable Canadian engineer, painted the bleak outlook as he prescribed a radical cure on the once-proud Finnish mobile phone pioneer: The rejection of the company’s own Symbian smartphone operating system for a shotgun collaboration with Microsoft, itself stumbling badly in the sector.

On Thursday, the Nokia chief executive delivered the biggest news from the Finnish company since he started the last-ditch transformation: Nokia may be on its way back.

Thanks in part to an all-out marketing push, sales of its new smartphone line, the Lumia, powered by Microsoft’s Windows Phone operating system, soared more than 50 percent in the fourth quarter of last year, leading Nokia to an unexpected profit. Thanks largely to demand for its newest models, Nokia had to correct its financial forecasts — upward.

In what was seen as a make-or-break quarter, Mr. Elop was able to tell investors that Nokia would break even or turn a 2 percent profit rather than report a loss as large as 10 percent.

“While we definitely experienced some tough challenges in the first half of 2012, we are managing through these issues,” Mr. Elop said during a conference call with journalists.

What Nokia has accomplished under Mr. Elop, whose professional future is tied to resuscitating the company, is to produce a line of increasingly competitive smartphones that are starting to draw favorable comparisons with Samsung and Apple, the two companies most responsible for knocking Nokia from its lofty perch, according to analysts.

“The Lumia smartphones are night-and-day different from Nokia’s old Symbian handsets,” said Francisco Jeronimo, an analyst in London at International Data Corp. “I think what we are starting to see now is what will be a steady turnaround in Nokia’s fortunes.”

The company, which dominated the cellphone business until Apple introduced its iPhone in 2007, still has a long way to go to approach its former stature. In the third quarter, Nokia had just a 4 percent share of the global smartphone market, and was a distant No.10 in the sector, trailing the not-so-illustrious likes of LG and ZTE, among others, according to Strategy Analytics, a research firm.

Samsung and Apple, the No.1 and No.2 smartphone makers, together had 50 percent of the global smartphone market, and their shares were growing. While its competitors rose, Nokia has generated nearly €5 billion, or $6.5 billion, in losses under Mr. Elop, and eliminated of a third of its work force.

In October, Microsoft introduced the Windows Phone 8, the operating system that would be used in the top-of-the-line Lumia 920 and 820. Since then, Nokia has spent heavily on advertising in Britain and Europe to promote the models. The company will not disclose how much it had spent on its campaign, but its television ads were ubiquitous over the holidays, said Neil Mawston, an analyst at Strategy Analytics in London.

The heavy promotion, which was aided by Microsoft, whose own mobile strategy is intimately tied up with Nokia’s, has helped the company recapture some of its lost glory, Mr. Mawston said.

But Mr. Mawston warned that “Nokia still lacks the true killer phone that will enable it to compete with the iPhone 5 or Samsung Galaxy S III.”

Mr. Mawston said he expected Nokia’s share of the global smartphone market to rise to 6 percent by the end of the year.

The company’s financial position is likely to revive even more quickly as a result of the strict cost-cutting imposed by Mr. Elop, who used to run Microsoft’s business software division before coming to Nokia in late 2010.

Mr. Elop has eliminated a third of Nokia’s work force and shut factories across Europe. Last month, Nokia even sold its 540,000 square-foot, or 50,000 square-meter, glass-and-wood headquarters in the Helsinki suburb of Espoo to Finnish investors, and leased it back. The maneuver netted Nokia €170 million.

Besides a more competitive array of phones, Nokia has discarded its market-leader mentality. Employees are now routinely traveling in economy class and sharing rides to airports. Workers no longer use costly telephone conference calling but speak in group teleconferences using less expensive Internet calling services.

“The company is a lot smaller now but people are working better together,” said Susan Sheehan, a Nokia spokeswoman. “Everyone has been pitching in.”

Even at Nokia Siemens, the company’s long-suffering network equipment venture, the future is looking brighter than it was two years ago. On Thursday, Nokia said the unit, which contributes about 40 percent of its total sales, would report an operating profit for the third quarter, its third straight quarterly profit.

Nokia, in its information to investors, even revised the operating profit forecast at the venture to 13 percent to 15 percent of sales, up from a range of 4 percent to 12 percent.

Looking ahead, Nokia said it expected to return to an operating loss of 2 percent of sales in the first quarter amid the post-holiday buying lull and harsh competition. But the results for the coming three months could vary widely, Nokia warned, from an even bigger 6 percent operating loss to a 2 percent profit.

Pete Cunningham, an analyst at Canalys, a research firm in Reading, England, said that Nokia’s improving financial position was a positive step but that the company still faced challenges.

“On face value, this is a positive for Nokia,” Mr. Cunningham said. “But 2013 could still turn out to be another very difficult year for Nokia. It is way too premature to say that the company has made a turnaround.”

Mr. Cunningham said he used the Lumia 920, Nokia’s newest smartphone, during the Christmas holidays and liked the experience.

“But the more I used the phone, the more apparent it became to me that there are big gaps between Lumia and its competitors in terms of the functionality and usability of its apps,” Mr. Cunningham said. “I still think there is a lot of work to be done on Lumia.”

Read More..

City Room: How Are You Warding Off the Flu?

Sure, you could go out and get a flu shot like everyone keeps telling you to do. It’s relatively cheap, and available just about everywhere.

But the shot is not 100 percent effective. And it takes two weeks to kick in. Although influenza can be deadly, some have been making light of the virus’s symptoms.

On the bright side, having the flu was a great start to my spring break diet.. eating nothing and still managing to puke

— Allison (@Ally_YM) 6 Jan 13

Turns out I don’t have the flu, I just really like NyQuil and hate wearing pants.

— NYC Blonde (@NYC_Blonde) 10 Jan 13

If you’re holding out, or procrastinating, or have decided against getting vaccinated altogether, what alternative means are you using to keep those bad bugs away? Comment in the box below.

Read More..

City Room: How Are You Warding Off the Flu?

Sure, you could go out and get a flu shot like everyone keeps telling you to do. It’s relatively cheap, and available just about everywhere.

But the shot is not 100 percent effective. And it takes two weeks to kick in. Although influenza can be deadly, some have been making light of the virus’s symptoms.

On the bright side, having the flu was a great start to my spring break diet.. eating nothing and still managing to puke

— Allison (@Ally_YM) 6 Jan 13

Turns out I don’t have the flu, I just really like NyQuil and hate wearing pants.

— NYC Blonde (@NYC_Blonde) 10 Jan 13

If you’re holding out, or procrastinating, or have decided against getting vaccinated altogether, what alternative means are you using to keep those bad bugs away? Comment in the box below.

Read More..

Sharp Words From European Minister for Countries in North

BRUSSELS — Jean-Claude Juncker, the departing leader of the group of ministers who oversee the euro currency, sharply criticized northern Europeans on Thursday for demanding austerity budgets from their southern neighbors.

But in the same speech he seemed to endorse as his successor an official from the Netherlands, one of countries that has made the toughest demands for fiscal rigor in the euro zone.

Mr. Juncker, himself a northern European and prime minister of Luxembourg, told members of the European Parliament’s influential Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee that northerners had falsely painted themselves as more economically virtuous than southerners. “I’m totally against this distinction,” he said.

Mr. Juncker warned that some members of his own country’s Parliament had become fed up with “the German diktat,” and he said countries making painful economic adjustments should be rewarded for their efforts.

“We have been arrogant” toward countries like Greece, he said.

Still, Mr. Juncker said his successor as head of the Eurogroup of ministers would speak one of the languages of the Benelux, a grouping that includes Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg. Mr. Juncker’s comments were characteristically cryptic, but appeared to lend weight to the chances of the front-runner for the job, Jeroen Dijsselbloem, the Dutch finance minister.

The president of the Eurogroup plays a coordinating role among finance ministers when they make critical decisions like giving political approval for bailouts or pressuring governments to shore up their finances to preserve the stability of the euro. Mr. Juncker has held the post since 2005; although his term expired last summer, he indicated he would stay on for a limited time until a successor was named.

At a news conference Thursday, Mr. Juncker said a decision on his successor should be made on, or shortly after, Jan. 21, because that would be the last meeting of the Eurogroup at which he would serve as president.

Although the president of the Eurogroup is supposed to be elected by ministers, as a practical matter is decided by consensus among governments, opening the way for political horse-trading.

Mr. Dijsselbloem’s candidacy gained strength in recent weeks partly because he comes from a country that still holds a triple-A debt rating, making him a natural ally of Germany. But his candidacy is more problematic for the French, the other major power in the euro area.

The government led by President François Hollande has emphasized giving the most vulnerable members of the euro area the leeway to make painful economic adjustments. By contrast, the Netherlands, along with Germany and Finland, has pressed indebted nations like Greece and Portugal to tighten their belts, despite the recessionary effect on their economies.

One factor that could help the French swing in support of Mr. Dijsselbloem, a member of the Dutch Labor Party, is that he, like Mr. Hollande, is a socialist.

Meanwhile, for the soon-to-be created single banking supervisory agency for the euro zone, Mr. Juncker suggested Thursday that a Frenchwoman could be offered a senior role. And although Mr. Juncker again did not offer names, there are reports in the French news media that Danièle Nouy, an official at the Banque de France, could be offered such a role, partly to assuage French concerns.

Mr. Dijsselbloem, 46, won the finance portfolio, his first Netherlands cabinet post, late last year, and he has little experience at the top levels of government or in European affairs. But he did take office in time to participate in a round of marathon meetings by finance ministers to strike agreements on resuming aid to Greece and the creation of the single banking supervisor.

“I suppose he is suitable as he wouldn’t be finance minister,” said Sophie in ‘t Veld, a Dutch member of the European Parliament for the Democrats 66, a liberal and pro-European political party.

“But how is he going to navigate between the deeply euro-skeptic electorate and a deeply euro-skeptic Parliament that will expect him to be a troublemaker in Europe and, on the other hand, show compromise and consensus as the head of the Eurogroup?” she asked.

Mr. Dijsselbloem told the Dutch daily newspaper De Volkskrant at the end of December that he regarded “strengthening European cooperation inevitable and good for the Netherlands.” But he also cautioned that, “when it comes to Greece, for example, everyone looks to the Netherlands and we have to take the floor” and that, “from us, from Germany and Finland, it’s expected that we exhibit some strictness.”

That, though, is an approach that Mr. Juncker on Thursday cautioned his successor against taking. For countries like Greece and Portugal facing brutal austerity, he said, there should be rewards for meeting targets and “not only a big stick.”

Mr. Juncker also called for euro area countries to adopt a legal minimum wage so as not “to lose the support of the working classes.”

And in a marked contrast to the stance of some Dutch politicians, Mr. Juncker suggested that countries like Spain and Ireland should have some scope for using European bailout funds to bail out their banks directly. Otherwise, said Mr. Juncker, the purpose of the bailout fund “would lose a large part of its sense.”

For his part, Mr. Juncker said at the news conference that he would concentrate on winning another term as the prime minister of Luxembourg and use that perch to continue to play a role in European affairs.

“You will hear from me,” he said.

Read More..